Simply put, Scott Schnoll is and always will be a legend among the Exchange crowd. He always gives some great talks.
Let’s hop right into it:
- Storage Enhancements
- Multiple Databases per volume
- Number of copies must equal the number on volumes
- Example of valid design: Databases 1 through 4 are copied onto 4 volumes in an ‘Active/Standby/Standby/Lagged’ configuration
- This also ties into Automatic Reseeding
- Reseeds are much faster in this scenario – potential days shaved off
- 20% reduction in passive copy IOPS
- Allows for an increase in disk utilization (MSIT was able to go from 360 to 600 mailboxes on the same spindles)
- Failover is ~10 seconds in the production environment!
- Requirements:
- 1 Partition
- The number of database copies per volume must equal the copies of each database
- This also ties into Automatic Reseeding
- Best Practices
- Same neighbors on all servers
- Balance your Activation Preferences
- Number of copies must equal the number on volumes
- Automatic Reseeding
- Uses spare drives mapped to mount points to handle failover (think of it like storage level sparing)
- Much easier to implement this from the start – while you can transition to this, it is NOT easy
- Basic ‘How it works’
- Configure Storage
- Create DAG
- Create Directory and mount points
- Configure DAG Properties
- AutoDagVolumesRootFolderPath
- AutoDagDatasesRootFolderPath
- AutoDagDatabaseCopiesPerVolume
- Create Databases
- Put some mailboxes on them
- Automatic Recovery from Storage Failues
- Used for hung databases, locked controllers, etc.
- Works like Managed availability – will restart services/attempt to mount, else restarts server if good copy exists elsewhere in DAG that is mountable
- Improved Lagged Copies
- Activation is simplified!
- Automatic Playback of log files in critical situations
- Yes, Exchange 2013 is nearly self-aware.
- Integration with Safety Net (FKA Transport Dumpster)
- Takes care of itself
- Handles low log disk space (plays in log files to free up space)
- Page Patching
- Activates itself if less than 3 good copies!
- Also configurable via AD and registry (have to modify both)
- No need for log surgery or hunting for corruption – it handles it for you!
- Multiple Databases per volume
- Managed Availability
- Gives the Best Server & Copy Selection process increased functionality and intelligence in its decision making processes
- It notifies through the event logs so 3rd party folks can snag events
- SCOM is highly recommended
- It really will damage test environments if you don’t change the defaults!
- Single Copy Alerting
- In 2010 it was a scheduled task
- Now it’s an MA rule
- Will throw eventID 4138 for Red, 4139 for Green
- Best Copy Selection Changes
- Looks at the entire server
- Active Manager runs it
- Includes the protocol stack to insure that any move will actually function.
- Will prefer servers in this order:
- All Healthy Status
- Health Sets at Medium or higher
- Better than source
- Same as source
- Maintenance Mode
- Now there’s a maintenance mode!
- DAG Networks
- Automatically configured
- This is based on the idea that your MAPI network interface has a registration in DNS while your Replication interface should NOT.
- Can always be manually configured.
- Automatically configured
- Site Resiliency
- 2010 – Operationally complex, you have to shift everything (MBX, HUB, CAS) and the namespace is a single point of failure
- 2013 – Simplified, can recover either CAS/MBX or both, and the namespace is now redundant
- Recovery is automatic now
- DNS resolves to multiple IP address
- Clients (Outlook 2007+, OWA, etc.) will skip failed IP addresses after 20 second timeouts
- Preferred Configuration
- 3 Sites
- 2 sites with Exchange components
- 1 site with file share witness (minimal requirements)
- This host is highly recommended to be isolated from the networks of the 2 Exchange sites (i.e. if your 2 sites are on ATT, run the 3rd on Verizon)
- 3 Sites
- Expect ~20 second site failovers for CAS, similar time for MBX
- Can manually failover sites through 3 powershell commands!
So, I’ll give you some brief Cliff’s on this rather lengthy synopsis: It will be very difficult to kill off a properly architected Exchange 2013 installation.
Spot on with this write-up, I really believe this website needs much more attention.
I’ll probably be back again to read through more, thanks for the advice!